Interesting, but didn't the folks from System One specifically say that Jev isn't really tuned for these kind of "Has the rest of the owl been drawn?"-style prompts?
For example:
> Non-obvious code lacks explanation of its rationale
This is so open-ended, I don't really think you're going to get reliable feedback from Jev here, at least according to my interpretation of what System One representatives were saying.
Worth saying how read-only is enforced rather than promised. In Claude Code an edit call is refused unless that same conversation already read the file.
For example:
> Non-obvious code lacks explanation of its rationale
This is so open-ended, I don't really think you're going to get reliable feedback from Jev here, at least according to my interpretation of what System One representatives were saying.
We can now replace Kolmogorov complexity-based metrics with pure Jev-slop code quality metrics.